HostXAUT0 vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
XAUT0 (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
XAUT0 vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| XAUT0 | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.34K | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $9.30M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.08M | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $420.48K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $9.30M | — |
| Holders | 5,996 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~4,029× the liquidity of XAUT0
- CCV measures ~2,542× the 24h volume of XAUT0
What the data says
XAUT0
XAUT0 is the omnichain version of Tether Gold — XAUT bridged onto Solana through the OFT standard so one token represents a claim on a London-vaulted gold ounce. The mint AymATz4TCL9sWNEEV9Kvyz45CHVhDZ6kUgjTJPzLpU9P is what our scan tracks: $9.3 million market cap, $420 thousand of liquidity and 5,996 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The custody stack is the honest part: token, bridge representation, Tether's issuance, vaulted gold — four layers between you and metal. That is standard for tokenized commodities, and Tether Gold is the incumbent of the category, but it means the claim's quality depends on the issuer's attestations and the bridge's security alike. Priced near spot gold, the premium-or-discount to XAU is the figure to watch.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XAUT0 or CCV?
By tracked market cap: XAUT0 (Solana) measures $9.30M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XAUT0 or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: XAUT0 (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XAUT0 and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show XAUT0 at −1.45% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
XAUT0 vs RYYXAUT0 vs FKBXAUT0 vs CRDXAUT0 vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.