HostWLD vs OPUS — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs OPUS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-28.
WLD vs OPUS — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| WLD | OPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5511 | $0.0007999 |
| Market cap | $2.05B | $854.62K |
| 24h volume | $253.44K | $252.98 |
| Liquidity | $140.93K | $122.62K |
| FDV | $5.51B | $854.62K |
| Holders | 63,635 | 682 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~2,397× the market cap of OPUS
- WLD measures ~1,002× the 24h volume of OPUS
- WLD measures ~93× the holder count of OPUS
What the data says
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
OPUS
Opus Genesis — OPUS — a Solana AI-agent token from the agent-wave generation (an agent-persona project), at mint Dxg9cLvssqb1WEMpyynjf17kGRc4UTNyUqjzNj99opus. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $123 thousand of liquidity and roughly 682 holders.
The honest number here is 682 holders — a narrow registry under a $123 thousand pool means concentration: a small set of wallets effectively sets the price. Agent-persona economics are attention economics with a product skin.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or OPUS?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B and OPUS (Solana) measures $854.62K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or OPUS?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and OPUS (Solana) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and OPUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show WLD at 0.00% and OPUS at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs KETWLD vs AMDAURY vs OPUSPOL vs OPUSOPUS vs PERPSPADOPUS vs SCAM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.