HostWLD vs KET — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs KET (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WLD vs KET — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| WLD | KET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5511 | $0.001595 |
| Market cap | $2.05B | $1.59M |
| 24h volume | $253.44K | $566.64 |
| Liquidity | $140.93K | $140.56K |
| FDV | $5.51B | $1.59M |
| Holders | 63,635 | 32,354 |
| Age (days) | — | 614 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~1,284× the market cap of KET
- WLD measures ~447× the 24h volume of KET
- WLD measures ~2.0× the holder count of KET
What the data says
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
KET
KET at 0xffff003a6bad9b743d658048742935fffe2b6ed7 is an Avalanche community token 614 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $1.6 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep for the cap and the tape healthy: $140.6 thousand of tracked depth on $65.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool proportionate to the small valuation, cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or KET?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B and KET (Avalanche) measures $1.59M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or KET?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and KET (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and KET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show WLD at 0.00% and KET at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs AMDWLD vs EURWBURNIE vs KET9QRI vs KETKET vs AMDKET vs EURW
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.