Host9QRI vs WLD — price, size and safety, side by side
9QRI (Solana) vs WLD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-27.
9QRI vs WLD — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| 9QRI | WLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001502 | $0.5511 |
| Market cap | $933.00K | $2.05B |
| 24h volume | $1.28K | $253.44K |
| Liquidity | $141.23K | $140.93K |
| FDV | $933.00K | $5.51B |
| Holders | 7,149 | 63,635 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~2,195× the market cap of 9QRI
- WLD measures ~198× the 24h volume of 9QRI
- WLD measures ~8.9× the holder count of 9QRI
What the data says
9QRI
9QRI — mint 9qriMjPPAJTMCtfQnz7Mo9BsV2jAWTr2ff7yc3JWpump, its own name vanity-minted into the address — is a pump.fun graduate holding $933 thousand across 7,149 holders in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The vanity mint is the one unusual detail: grinding a self-referential mint address takes real compute or a vanity service, a small but nonzero production cost that most launches skip. The rest is the standard graduate profile — mint and freeze revoked, dev wallet 0.016%, ~$140 of cap per wallet, ~$7 thousand of daily volume on $141 thousand.
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 9QRI or WLD?
By tracked market cap: 9QRI (Solana) measures $933.00K and WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 9QRI or WLD?
On the contract checks we publish: 9QRI (Solana) grades A and WLD (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 9QRI and WLD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show 9QRI at 0.00% and WLD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
9QRI vs BURNIE9QRI vs KET9QRI vs AMD9QRI vs EURWWLD vs BURNIEWLD vs KETWLD vs AMDWLD vs EURW
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.