HostWLD vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WLD vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| WLD | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5511 | $0.3436 |
| Market cap | $2.05B | $539.21M |
| 24h volume | $253.44K | $633.85K |
| Liquidity | $140.93K | $10.48M |
| FDV | $5.51B | $831.96M |
| Holders | 63,635 | 100,872 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~3.8× the market cap of CRV
- CRV measures ~74× the liquidity of WLD
- CRV measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of WLD
- CRV measures ~1.6× the holder count of WLD
What the data says
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or CRV?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B and CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show WLD at 0.00% and CRV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs KETWLD vs AMDUSDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.