HostVSN vs ENS — price, size and safety, side by side
VSN (Arbitrum) vs ENS (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
VSN vs ENS — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| VSN | ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04384 | $7.07 |
| Market cap | $166.29M | $298.08M |
| 24h volume | $61.37K | $18.32K |
| Liquidity | $909.27K | $888.82K |
| FDV | $4.49M | $706.77M |
| Holders | 43,114 | 66,942 |
| Age (days) | 314 | — |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ENS measures ~1.8× the market cap of VSN
- VSN measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of ENS
- ENS measures ~1.6× the holder count of VSN
What the data says
VSN
VSN at 0x6fbbbd8bfb1cd3986b1d05e7861a0f62f87db74b — Vision — is an Arbitrum asset 314 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $166.3 million market cap dwarfs the $4.5 million fully-diluted figure priced on the 101.2 million local units — the familiar shape where the headline valuation lives on another venue while this chain carries a slice.
The local book is thin against that headline: $909.3 thousand of tracked depth on $38.5 thousand of daily volume — a quiet book that does its real clearing elsewhere. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question.
ENS
ENS has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why ENS is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, ENS shows a $888.82K pool and 66,942 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $298.08M, that $888.82K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 66,942 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ENS holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VSN or ENS?
By tracked market cap: VSN (Arbitrum) measures $166.29M and ENS (Ethereum) measures $298.08M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VSN or ENS?
On the contract checks we publish: VSN (Arbitrum) grades B and ENS (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VSN and ENS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show VSN at 0.00% and ENS at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs VSNFWA vs VSNVSN vs UPPPOLY vs VSNENS vs AAVEUP vs ENSENS vs FFENS vs EMBER
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.