HostENS vs FF — price, size and safety, side by side
ENS (Ethereum) vs FF (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-28.
ENS vs FF — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| ENS | FF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7.07 | $0.1258 |
| Market cap | $298.08M | $402.44M |
| 24h volume | $18.32K | $6.17M |
| Liquidity | $888.82K | $873.15K |
| FDV | $706.77M | $62.64M |
| Holders | 66,942 | 27,928 |
| Age (days) | — | 359 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FF measures ~337× the 24h volume of ENS
- ENS measures ~2.4× the holder count of FF
What the data says
ENS
ENS has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why ENS is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, ENS shows a $888.82K pool and 66,942 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $298.08M, that $888.82K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 66,942 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ENS holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FF
FF at 0xac23b90a79504865d52b49b327328411a23d4db2 — Falcon Finance — is a 359-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $402.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $62.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 488.7 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is loud: $873.1 thousand of tracked depth on $6.2 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool seven times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ENS or FF?
By tracked market cap: ENS (Ethereum) measures $298.08M and FF (BNB Chain) measures $402.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ENS or FF?
On the contract checks we publish: ENS (Ethereum) grades B and FF (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ENS and FF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show ENS at 0.00% and FF at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ENS vs AAVEUP vs ENSENS vs EMBERVSN vs ENSFF vs EMBERFF vs VINEFF vs WSTETHFF vs AURA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.