HostUP vs ENS — price, size and safety, side by side
UP (BNB Chain) vs ENS (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UP vs ENS — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| UP | ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3038 | $7.07 |
| Market cap | $65.63M | $298.08M |
| 24h volume | $9.52M | $18.32K |
| Liquidity | $897.16K | $888.82K |
| FDV | $274.70M | $706.77M |
| Holders | 9,978 | 66,942 |
| Age (days) | 124 | — |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ENS measures ~4.5× the market cap of UP
- UP measures ~520× the 24h volume of ENS
- ENS measures ~6.7× the holder count of UP
What the data says
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $65.6 million market cap against a $274.7 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $897.2 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ENS
ENS has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why ENS is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, ENS shows a $888.82K pool and 66,942 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $298.08M, that $888.82K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 66,942 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ENS holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UP or ENS?
By tracked market cap: UP (BNB Chain) measures $65.63M and ENS (Ethereum) measures $298.08M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UP or ENS?
On the contract checks we publish: UP (BNB Chain) grades A and ENS (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UP and ENS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show UP at 0.00% and ENS at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UP vs AAVEVSN vs UPUSDT0 vs UPUP vs FFENS vs AAVEENS vs FFENS vs EMBERVSN vs ENS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.