Open app

USDAI vs ESP — price, size and safety, side by side

USDAI (Arbitrum) vs ESP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

USDAIB

$1.00
USDai on Arbitrum
Trade USDAI
vs

ESPB

$0.07395
Espresso on Arbitrum
Trade ESP

USDAI vs ESP — normalized performance, 2026-08-17 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
USDAI 0.00%  ·  ESP 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
USDAIESP
Price$1.00$0.07395
Market cap
24h volume$1.95M$420.51K
Liquidity$52.59K$514.49K
FDV
Holders
Age (days)52187
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

USDAI

USDAI is USD.ai's stablecoin — a dollar token backed by loans against GPU and AI-infrastructure collateral, one of the more unusual collateral stacks in the stablecoin set. The contract 0x0a1a1a107e45b7ced86833863f482bc5f4ed82ef is what our scan tracks: $53 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 17, 2026 on Arbitrum, trading essentially at its dollar peg.

The honest mechanics: the backing is hardware-collateralized lending — claims on AI infrastructure and the loans against it — which is genuinely different from the treasury-bill or crypto-overcollateralized models most stablecoins use, and carries its own risks (hardware values depreciate and loan books can go bad). The pool here is thin, so redemptions at size route through the issuer's machinery rather than the public market.

Full USDAI safety read →

ESP

ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $514 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 17, 2026 on Arbitrum.

The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.

Full ESP safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, USDAI or ESP?

By tracked market cap: USDAI (Arbitrum) measures — and ESP (Arbitrum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, USDAI or ESP?

On the contract checks we publish: USDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and ESP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have USDAI and ESP performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-08-17 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show USDAI at 0.00% and ESP at 0.00%.

More comparisons

USDAI vs RYYUSDAI vs FKBUSDAI vs CRDUSDAI vs RDKESP vs RYYESP vs FKBESP vs CRDESP vs RDK

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-17→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.