HostUSDAI vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
USDAI (Arbitrum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
USDAI vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| USDAI | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.95M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $52.59K | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 52 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~37,748× the liquidity of USDAI
- CRD measures ~2,066× the 24h volume of USDAI
What the data says
USDAI
USDAI is USD.ai's stablecoin — a dollar token backed by loans against GPU and AI-infrastructure collateral, one of the more unusual collateral stacks in the stablecoin set. The contract 0x0a1a1a107e45b7ced86833863f482bc5f4ed82ef is what our scan tracks: $53 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 17, 2026 on Arbitrum, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: the backing is hardware-collateralized lending — claims on AI infrastructure and the loans against it — which is genuinely different from the treasury-bill or crypto-overcollateralized models most stablecoins use, and carries its own risks (hardware values depreciate and loan books can go bad). The pool here is thin, so redemptions at size route through the issuer's machinery rather than the public market.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDAI or CRD?
By tracked market cap: USDAI (Arbitrum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDAI or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: USDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDAI and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show USDAI at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDAI vs RYYUSDAI vs FKBUSDAI vs RDKUSDAI vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.