HostUSDAI vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
USDAI (Arbitrum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
USDAI vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| USDAI | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.95M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $52.59K | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 52 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~33,141× the liquidity of USDAI
- RDK measures ~1,481× the 24h volume of USDAI
What the data says
USDAI
USDAI is USD.ai's stablecoin — a dollar token backed by loans against GPU and AI-infrastructure collateral, one of the more unusual collateral stacks in the stablecoin set. The contract 0x0a1a1a107e45b7ced86833863f482bc5f4ed82ef is what our scan tracks: $53 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 17, 2026 on Arbitrum, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: the backing is hardware-collateralized lending — claims on AI infrastructure and the loans against it — which is genuinely different from the treasury-bill or crypto-overcollateralized models most stablecoins use, and carries its own risks (hardware values depreciate and loan books can go bad). The pool here is thin, so redemptions at size route through the issuer's machinery rather than the public market.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDAI or RDK?
By tracked market cap: USDAI (Arbitrum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDAI or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: USDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDAI and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show USDAI at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDAI vs RYYUSDAI vs FKBUSDAI vs CRDUSDAI vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.