HostUNIBTC vs WLD — price, size and safety, side by side
UNIBTC (Optimism) vs WLD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UNIBTC vs WLD — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| UNIBTC | WLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $83.55K | $0.5511 |
| Market cap | $249.10M | $2.05B |
| 24h volume | $208.86 | $253.44K |
| Liquidity | $226.27K | $140.93K |
| FDV | $331.21K | $5.51B |
| Holders | 69,878 | 63,635 |
| Age (days) | 802 | — |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~8.2× the market cap of UNIBTC
- UNIBTC measures ~1.6× the liquidity of WLD
- WLD measures ~1,213× the 24h volume of UNIBTC
What the data says
UNIBTC
uniBTC at 0x93919784c523f39cacaa98ee0a9d96c3f32b593e is a bitcoin-denominated receipt on Optimism, 802 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $249.1 million market cap dwarfs a $331.2 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 4 local units — four coins' worth on this chain.
The local book is thin against the headline: $226.3 thousand of tracked depth on $10.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a sliver that mostly sits. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNIBTC or WLD?
By tracked market cap: UNIBTC (Optimism) measures $249.10M and WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNIBTC or WLD?
On the contract checks we publish: UNIBTC (Optimism) grades B and WLD (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNIBTC and WLD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show UNIBTC at 0.00% and WLD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UNIBTC vs SQDLASO vs UNIBTCUNIBTC vs CRVOPG vs UNIBTCWLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs KETWLD vs AMD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.