HostUMBRA vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
UMBRA (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
UMBRA vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| UMBRA | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1985 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $2.75M | — |
| 24h volume | $17.22K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $669.35K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $5.43M | — |
| Holders | 6,153 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~2,604× the liquidity of UMBRA
- RDK measures ~167,625× the 24h volume of UMBRA
- over the shared window UMBRA moved +16.1% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
UMBRA
UMBRA is the token of Umbra — a Solana privacy protocol bringing shielded payments to the chain, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its mint's vanity suffix signals. The mint PRVT6TB7uss3FrUd2D9xs2zqDBsa3GbMJMwCQsgmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.7 million market cap, $669 thousand of liquidity and 6,153 holders as of September 16, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch relative to cap.
The honest read: privacy on Solana is a real technical niche — Umbra's team includes known Solana builders, and MetaDAO-launched tokens carry the futarchy governance experiment on top of the usual protocol risk. The liquidity here is genuinely strong for this cap, but the regulatory posture around privacy protocols is the external risk no tokenomics can diversify away.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UMBRA or RDK?
By tracked market cap: UMBRA (Solana) measures $2.75M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UMBRA or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: UMBRA (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UMBRA and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show UMBRA at +16.1% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UMBRA vs RYYUMBRA vs FKBUMBRA vs CRDUMBRA vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.