HostUMBRA vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
UMBRA (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
UMBRA vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| UMBRA | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1985 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $2.75M | — |
| 24h volume | $17.22K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $669.35K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $5.43M | — |
| Holders | 6,153 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~3,265× the liquidity of UMBRA
- FKB measures ~142,046× the 24h volume of UMBRA
- over the shared window UMBRA moved +16.1% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
UMBRA
UMBRA is the token of Umbra — a Solana privacy protocol bringing shielded payments to the chain, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its mint's vanity suffix signals. The mint PRVT6TB7uss3FrUd2D9xs2zqDBsa3GbMJMwCQsgmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.7 million market cap, $669 thousand of liquidity and 6,153 holders as of September 16, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch relative to cap.
The honest read: privacy on Solana is a real technical niche — Umbra's team includes known Solana builders, and MetaDAO-launched tokens carry the futarchy governance experiment on top of the usual protocol risk. The liquidity here is genuinely strong for this cap, but the regulatory posture around privacy protocols is the external risk no tokenomics can diversify away.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UMBRA or FKB?
By tracked market cap: UMBRA (Solana) measures $2.75M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UMBRA or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: UMBRA (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UMBRA and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show UMBRA at +16.1% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UMBRA vs RYYUMBRA vs CRDUMBRA vs RDKUMBRA vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.