HostUMBRA vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
UMBRA (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
UMBRA vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| UMBRA | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1985 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $2.75M | — |
| 24h volume | $17.22K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $669.35K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $5.43M | — |
| Holders | 6,153 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~2,966× the liquidity of UMBRA
- CRD measures ~233,905× the 24h volume of UMBRA
- over the shared window UMBRA moved +16.1% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
UMBRA
UMBRA is the token of Umbra — a Solana privacy protocol bringing shielded payments to the chain, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its mint's vanity suffix signals. The mint PRVT6TB7uss3FrUd2D9xs2zqDBsa3GbMJMwCQsgmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.7 million market cap, $669 thousand of liquidity and 6,153 holders as of September 16, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch relative to cap.
The honest read: privacy on Solana is a real technical niche — Umbra's team includes known Solana builders, and MetaDAO-launched tokens carry the futarchy governance experiment on top of the usual protocol risk. The liquidity here is genuinely strong for this cap, but the regulatory posture around privacy protocols is the external risk no tokenomics can diversify away.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UMBRA or CRD?
By tracked market cap: UMBRA (Solana) measures $2.75M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UMBRA or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: UMBRA (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UMBRA and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show UMBRA at +16.1% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UMBRA vs RYYUMBRA vs FKBUMBRA vs RDKUMBRA vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.