HostRENDER vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
RENDER vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| RENDER | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.42 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $625.95M | — |
| 24h volume | $165.26K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $70.59K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $625.95M | — |
| Holders | 125,518 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~31,970× the liquidity of RENDER
- RYY measures ~21,035× the 24h volume of RENDER
- over the shared window RENDER moved −6.19% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $626 million of market capitalization with 125,518 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or RYY?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $625.95M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show RENDER at −6.19% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RENDER vs FKBRENDER vs CRDRENDER vs RDKRENDER vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.