HostRENDER vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
RENDER vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| RENDER | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.42 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $625.95M | — |
| 24h volume | $165.26K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $70.59K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $625.95M | — |
| Holders | 125,518 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~30,961× the liquidity of RENDER
- FKB measures ~14,801× the 24h volume of RENDER
- over the shared window RENDER moved −6.19% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $626 million of market capitalization with 125,518 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or FKB?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $625.95M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show RENDER at −6.19% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RENDER vs RYYRENDER vs CRDRENDER vs RDKRENDER vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.