HostRENDER vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
RENDER vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| RENDER | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.43 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $625.95M | — |
| 24h volume | $165.26K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $70.59K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $625.95M | — |
| Holders | 125,518 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~24,002× the liquidity of RENDER
- CCV measures ~16,588× the 24h volume of RENDER
- over the shared window RENDER moved −5.07% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $626 million of market capitalization with 125,518 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or CCV?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $625.95M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show RENDER at −5.07% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RENDER vs RYYRENDER vs FKBRENDER vs CRDRENDER vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.