Open app

NVDAON vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side

NVDAON (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

NVDAONA

$221.06
NVIDIA (Ondo Tokenized) on Solana
Trade NVDAON
vs

RYYB

$1.08
Reyayu on Base
Trade RYY

NVDAON vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
NVDAON +4.21%  ·  RYY 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
NVDAONRYY
Price$221.06$1.08
Market cap$3.61M
24h volume$3.94K$3.48B
Liquidity$491.43$2.26B
FDV$3.61M
Holders1,781
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

NVDAON

NVDAON is Ondo's tokenized NVIDIA — the third issuer family bringing tokenized equities to Solana (alongside Backed's xStocks and the pre-IPO products). The mint gEGtLTPNQ7jcg25zTetkbmF7teoDLcrfTnQfmn2ondo is what our scan tracks: $3.6 million market cap on $491 of pool liquidity with 1,781 holders as of September 16, 2026.

The flag is arithmetic again: a real, regulated issuer product sitting on a five-hundred-dollar pool — Ondo's tokens settle and redeem through Ondo's own rails, so public-pool depth is structurally thin and most holders interact with the issuer rather than this market. The claim is real; the exit route is not the pool. Compare liquidity conditions before choosing between the tokenized-NVDA products on the chain.

Full NVDAON safety read →

RYY

The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.

Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.

Full RYY safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, NVDAON or RYY?

By tracked market cap: NVDAON (Solana) measures $3.61M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, NVDAON or RYY?

On the contract checks we publish: NVDAON (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have NVDAON and RYY performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show NVDAON at +4.21% and RYY at 0.00%.

More comparisons

NVDAON vs FKBNVDAON vs CRDNVDAON vs RDKNVDAON vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.