HostNVDAON vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
NVDAON (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
NVDAON vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| NVDAON | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $221.06 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $3.61M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.94K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $491.43 | $1.74B |
| FDV | $3.61M | — |
| Holders | 1,781 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~3,546,359× the liquidity of NVDAON
- RDK measures ~732,193× the 24h volume of NVDAON
What the data says
NVDAON
NVDAON is Ondo's tokenized NVIDIA — the third issuer family bringing tokenized equities to Solana (alongside Backed's xStocks and the pre-IPO products). The mint gEGtLTPNQ7jcg25zTetkbmF7teoDLcrfTnQfmn2ondo is what our scan tracks: $3.6 million market cap on $491 of pool liquidity with 1,781 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The flag is arithmetic again: a real, regulated issuer product sitting on a five-hundred-dollar pool — Ondo's tokens settle and redeem through Ondo's own rails, so public-pool depth is structurally thin and most holders interact with the issuer rather than this market. The claim is real; the exit route is not the pool. Compare liquidity conditions before choosing between the tokenized-NVDA products on the chain.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NVDAON or RDK?
By tracked market cap: NVDAON (Solana) measures $3.61M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NVDAON or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: NVDAON (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NVDAON and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show NVDAON at +4.21% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
NVDAON vs RYYNVDAON vs FKBNVDAON vs CRDNVDAON vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.