HostNVDAON vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
NVDAON (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
NVDAON vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| NVDAON | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $221.06 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $3.61M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.94K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $491.43 | $1.69B |
| FDV | $3.61M | — |
| Holders | 1,781 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~3,447,697× the liquidity of NVDAON
- CCV measures ~695,381× the 24h volume of NVDAON
What the data says
NVDAON
NVDAON is Ondo's tokenized NVIDIA — the third issuer family bringing tokenized equities to Solana (alongside Backed's xStocks and the pre-IPO products). The mint gEGtLTPNQ7jcg25zTetkbmF7teoDLcrfTnQfmn2ondo is what our scan tracks: $3.6 million market cap on $491 of pool liquidity with 1,781 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The flag is arithmetic again: a real, regulated issuer product sitting on a five-hundred-dollar pool — Ondo's tokens settle and redeem through Ondo's own rails, so public-pool depth is structurally thin and most holders interact with the issuer rather than this market. The claim is real; the exit route is not the pool. Compare liquidity conditions before choosing between the tokenized-NVDA products on the chain.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NVDAON or CCV?
By tracked market cap: NVDAON (Solana) measures $3.61M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NVDAON or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: NVDAON (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NVDAON and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show NVDAON at +4.21% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
NVDAON vs RYYNVDAON vs FKBNVDAON vs CRDNVDAON vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.