HostNVDAON vs CHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
NVDAON (Solana) vs CHIP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
NVDAON vs CHIP — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| NVDAON | CHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $221.06 | $0.0281 |
| Market cap | $3.61M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.94K | $957.59K |
| Liquidity | $491.43 | $999.49K |
| FDV | $3.61M | — |
| Holders | 1,781 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 118 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~2,034× the liquidity of NVDAON
- CHIP measures ~243× the 24h volume of NVDAON
What the data says
NVDAON
NVDAON is Ondo's tokenized NVIDIA — the third issuer family bringing tokenized equities to Solana (alongside Backed's xStocks and the pre-IPO products). The mint gEGtLTPNQ7jcg25zTetkbmF7teoDLcrfTnQfmn2ondo is what our scan tracks: $3.6 million market cap on $491 of pool liquidity with 1,781 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The flag is arithmetic again: a real, regulated issuer product sitting on a five-hundred-dollar pool — Ondo's tokens settle and redeem through Ondo's own rails, so public-pool depth is structurally thin and most holders interact with the issuer rather than this market. The claim is real; the exit route is not the pool. Compare liquidity conditions before choosing between the tokenized-NVDA products on the chain.
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $999 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 17, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NVDAON or CHIP?
By tracked market cap: NVDAON (Solana) measures $3.61M and CHIP (Arbitrum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NVDAON or CHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: NVDAON (Solana) grades A and CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NVDAON and CHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show NVDAON at +4.21% and CHIP at 0.00%.
More comparisons
NVDAON vs RYYNVDAON vs FKBNVDAON vs CRDNVDAON vs RDKCHIP vs RYYCHIP vs FKBCHIP vs CRDCHIP vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.