HostMNGO vs COST — price, size and safety, side by side
MNGO (Solana) vs COST (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
MNGO vs COST — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MNGO | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03208 | $892.26 |
| Market cap | $33.78M | $126.37K |
| 24h volume | $51.19 | $304.07K |
| Liquidity | $56.03K | $56.17K |
| FDV | $33.78M | $126.37K |
| Holders | 13,606 | 2,070 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MNGO measures ~267× the market cap of COST
- COST measures ~5,940× the 24h volume of MNGO
- MNGO measures ~6.6× the holder count of COST
- over the shared window MNGO moved +0.79% while COST moved +315691764%
What the data says
MNGO
MNGO is Mango Markets' token — the Solana perp/lending DEX that survived one of the most famous exploits in DeFi history (a $114M market-manipulation incident that became a landmark crypto-fraud conviction) and kept operating through the aftermath. The mint MangoCzJ36AjZyKwVj3VnYU4GTonjfVEnJmvvWaxLac is what our scan tracks: $33.8 million market cap, $56 thousand of pool liquidity, 13,606 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: the exploit is the headline and also the lesson — oracle-manipulable collateral is what let it happen, and "protocol survived a nine-figure manipulation" is a strange kind of track record that cuts both ways. The venue still runs; the token carries the history in its discount.
COST
A tokenized representation of Costco (COST) equity exposure under Backpack Securities. Mint CZEB3WNZuF2Yz1z2H81RcCk8T7fsw82KB33zqamASVsg; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $56 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,070 holders.
Costco is a mega-cap, low-drama compounder — about the sleepiest underlying on this shelf. The wrapper is standard: synthetic exposure via issuer custody, no shareholder rights, 24/7 settlement.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MNGO or COST?
By tracked market cap: MNGO (Solana) measures $33.78M and COST (Solana) measures $126.37K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MNGO or COST?
On the contract checks we publish: MNGO (Solana) grades A and COST (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MNGO and COST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MNGO at +0.79% and COST at +315691764%.
More comparisons
MNGO vs RYYMNGO vs FKBMNGO vs CRDMNGO vs RDKCOST vs RYYCOST vs FKBCOST vs CRDCOST vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.