HostMNGO vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
MNGO (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MNGO vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MNGO | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03208 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $33.78M | — |
| 24h volume | $51.19 | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $56.03K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $33.78M | — |
| Holders | 13,606 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~31,102× the liquidity of MNGO
- RDK measures ~56,386,527× the 24h volume of MNGO
What the data says
MNGO
MNGO is Mango Markets' token — the Solana perp/lending DEX that survived one of the most famous exploits in DeFi history (a $114M market-manipulation incident that became a landmark crypto-fraud conviction) and kept operating through the aftermath. The mint MangoCzJ36AjZyKwVj3VnYU4GTonjfVEnJmvvWaxLac is what our scan tracks: $33.8 million market cap, $56 thousand of pool liquidity, 13,606 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: the exploit is the headline and also the lesson — oracle-manipulable collateral is what let it happen, and "protocol survived a nine-figure manipulation" is a strange kind of track record that cuts both ways. The venue still runs; the token carries the history in its discount.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MNGO or RDK?
By tracked market cap: MNGO (Solana) measures $33.78M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MNGO or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: MNGO (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MNGO and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MNGO at +0.79% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MNGO vs RYYMNGO vs FKBMNGO vs CRDMNGO vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.