HostMNGO vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
MNGO (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MNGO vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MNGO | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03208 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $33.78M | — |
| 24h volume | $51.19 | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $56.03K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $33.78M | — |
| Holders | 13,606 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~40,274× the liquidity of MNGO
- RYY measures ~67,906,355× the 24h volume of MNGO
What the data says
MNGO
MNGO is Mango Markets' token — the Solana perp/lending DEX that survived one of the most famous exploits in DeFi history (a $114M market-manipulation incident that became a landmark crypto-fraud conviction) and kept operating through the aftermath. The mint MangoCzJ36AjZyKwVj3VnYU4GTonjfVEnJmvvWaxLac is what our scan tracks: $33.8 million market cap, $56 thousand of pool liquidity, 13,606 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: the exploit is the headline and also the lesson — oracle-manipulable collateral is what let it happen, and "protocol survived a nine-figure manipulation" is a strange kind of track record that cuts both ways. The venue still runs; the token carries the history in its discount.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MNGO or RYY?
By tracked market cap: MNGO (Solana) measures $33.78M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MNGO or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: MNGO (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MNGO and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MNGO at +0.79% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MNGO vs FKBMNGO vs CRDMNGO vs RDKMNGO vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.