Open app

ICP vs FLUID — price, size and safety, side by side

ICP (Ethereum) vs FLUID (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

ICPB

$3.01
ICP on Ethereum
Trade ICP
vs

FLUIDB

$1.36
Fluid on Ethereum
Trade FLUID

ICP vs FLUID — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
ICP 0.00%  ·  FLUID 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
ICPFLUID
Price$3.01$1.36
Market cap
24h volume$1.18M$3.11M
Liquidity$543.84K$474.84K
FDV
Holders
Age (days)4311,699
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

ICP

One detail on ICP didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-08 snapshot: its authority state. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.

On the market side, ICP brings a $543.84K pool and an established 431-day history as of 2026-09-08. Depth like $543.84K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out.

Full ICP safety read →

FLUID

FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.

The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.

Full FLUID safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, ICP or FLUID?

By tracked market cap: ICP (Ethereum) measures — and FLUID (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, ICP or FLUID?

On the contract checks we publish: ICP (Ethereum) grades B and FLUID (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have ICP and FLUID performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show ICP at 0.00% and FLUID at 0.00%.

More comparisons

ICP vs RYYICP vs FKBICP vs CRDICP vs RDKFLUID vs RYYFLUID vs FKBFLUID vs CRDFLUID vs RDK

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.