Open app

FLUID vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

FLUID (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

FLUIDB

$1.36
Fluid on Ethereum
Trade FLUID
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

FLUID vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
FLUID 0.00%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
FLUIDCRD
Price$1.36$2.13K
Market cap
24h volume$3.11M$4.03B
Liquidity$474.84K$1.99B
FDV
Holders
Age (days)1,6991
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

FLUID

FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.

The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.

Full FLUID safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, FLUID or CRD?

By tracked market cap: FLUID (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, FLUID or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: FLUID (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have FLUID and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FLUID at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

FLUID vs RYYFLUID vs FKBFLUID vs RDKFLUID vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.