HostFLUID vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
FLUID (Ethereum) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FLUID vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FLUID | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.36 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.11M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $474.84K | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,699 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~4,603× the liquidity of FLUID
- FKB measures ~787× the 24h volume of FLUID
What the data says
FLUID
FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.
The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLUID or FKB?
By tracked market cap: FLUID (Ethereum) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLUID or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: FLUID (Ethereum) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLUID and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FLUID at 0.00% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FLUID vs RYYFLUID vs CRDFLUID vs RDKFLUID vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.