HostGRUMPY vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
GRUMPY (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
GRUMPY vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| GRUMPY | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002043 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $183.75K | — |
| 24h volume | $674.49 | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $23.83K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $183.75K | — |
| Holders | 78,135 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~71,098× the liquidity of GRUMPY
- CCV measures ~4,064,344× the 24h volume of GRUMPY
- over the shared window GRUMPY moved −20.2% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
GRUMPY
GRUMPY — Grumpy Cat — occupies the long tail of Solana's cat-meme canon: roughly $184 thousand of market capitalization in the September 16, 2026 snapshot, held across 78,135 wallets, on mint GRUmPYbiTpq9ZPy5LAqBMMze7kErf5dEX2i9qYfwoSmR. Seventy-eight thousand holders on a six-figure cap is the shape of a token whose big moment came and went, leaving the wallets as the record.
The contract closed out the way a memecoin should: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, creator-associated wallet under 0.01% of supply — all confirmed in the snapshot. GRUMPY deflated on attention, not on any of the extraction mechanics this scanner exists to catch; there is a real difference between a faded token and a rugged one, and this is the former.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRUMPY or CCV?
By tracked market cap: GRUMPY (Solana) measures $183.75K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRUMPY or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: GRUMPY (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRUMPY and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show GRUMPY at −20.2% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GRUMPY vs RYYGRUMPY vs FKBGRUMPY vs CRDGRUMPY vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.