HostGMT vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GMT vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GMT | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007237 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $10.99M | — |
| 24h volume | $18.05K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $1.89K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $10.99M | — |
| Holders | 418,712 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~1,193,390× the liquidity of GMT
- RYY measures ~192,600× the 24h volume of GMT
What the data says
GMT
GMT is the half of STEPN that was supposed to be scarce. Where GST (also in our corpus) was the freely-minted earn token, GMT was the governance asset — capped supply, staged unlocks, the token that briefly commanded a multi-billion-dollar valuation in 2022 when move-to-earn looked like the future of fitness. The Solana deployment at mint 7i5KKsX2weiTkry7jA4ZwSuXGhs5eJBEjY8vVxR4pfRx now reads, in HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 418,712 holders, roughly $11.0 million of market capitalization — and $1.9 thousand of tracked on-chain liquidity, the thinnest pool depth of any token this site grades.
That last figure demands its explanation, because it's less damning than it looks and more instructive: GMT is a multi-chain token (it lives on BNB Chain and Ethereum too) whose real trading migrated to centralized exchanges years ago. The Solana pools our read samples are an abandoned side door, not the market. But the practical consequence for a Solana-wallet holder is identical either way — swapping GMT on-chain at any size means catastrophic slippage, and the honest route out runs through a CEX deposit.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or RYY?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Solana) measures $10.99M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GMT at −3.81% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GMT vs FKBGMT vs CRDGMT vs RDKGMT vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.