HostGMT vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GMT vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GMT | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007237 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $10.99M | — |
| 24h volume | $18.05K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $1.89K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $10.99M | — |
| Holders | 418,712 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~1,155,724× the liquidity of GMT
- FKB measures ~135,523× the 24h volume of GMT
What the data says
GMT
GMT is the half of STEPN that was supposed to be scarce. Where GST (also in our corpus) was the freely-minted earn token, GMT was the governance asset — capped supply, staged unlocks, the token that briefly commanded a multi-billion-dollar valuation in 2022 when move-to-earn looked like the future of fitness. The Solana deployment at mint 7i5KKsX2weiTkry7jA4ZwSuXGhs5eJBEjY8vVxR4pfRx now reads, in HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 418,712 holders, roughly $11.0 million of market capitalization — and $1.9 thousand of tracked on-chain liquidity, the thinnest pool depth of any token this site grades.
That last figure demands its explanation, because it's less damning than it looks and more instructive: GMT is a multi-chain token (it lives on BNB Chain and Ethereum too) whose real trading migrated to centralized exchanges years ago. The Solana pools our read samples are an abandoned side door, not the market. But the practical consequence for a Solana-wallet holder is identical either way — swapping GMT on-chain at any size means catastrophic slippage, and the honest route out runs through a CEX deposit.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or FKB?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Solana) measures $10.99M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GMT at −3.81% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GMT vs RYYGMT vs CRDGMT vs RDKGMT vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.