HostGMT vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GMT vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GMT | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007237 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $10.99M | — |
| 24h volume | $18.05K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $1.89K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $10.99M | — |
| Holders | 418,712 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~921,605× the liquidity of GMT
- RDK measures ~159,926× the 24h volume of GMT
What the data says
GMT
GMT is the half of STEPN that was supposed to be scarce. Where GST (also in our corpus) was the freely-minted earn token, GMT was the governance asset — capped supply, staged unlocks, the token that briefly commanded a multi-billion-dollar valuation in 2022 when move-to-earn looked like the future of fitness. The Solana deployment at mint 7i5KKsX2weiTkry7jA4ZwSuXGhs5eJBEjY8vVxR4pfRx now reads, in HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 418,712 holders, roughly $11.0 million of market capitalization — and $1.9 thousand of tracked on-chain liquidity, the thinnest pool depth of any token this site grades.
That last figure demands its explanation, because it's less damning than it looks and more instructive: GMT is a multi-chain token (it lives on BNB Chain and Ethereum too) whose real trading migrated to centralized exchanges years ago. The Solana pools our read samples are an abandoned side door, not the market. But the practical consequence for a Solana-wallet holder is identical either way — swapping GMT on-chain at any size means catastrophic slippage, and the honest route out runs through a CEX deposit.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or RDK?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Solana) measures $10.99M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GMT at −3.81% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GMT vs RYYGMT vs FKBGMT vs CRDGMT vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.