HostGHST vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
GHST (Base) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GHST vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GHST | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1014 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.20M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $43.18M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 237 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~40× the liquidity of GHST
- RDK measures ~901× the 24h volume of GHST
What the data says
GHST
GHST is Aavegotchi's token — the governance-and-utility asset of one of the older surviving blockchain games, deployed to Base where the project's community migrated for cheaper play. The address 0xac780b6e4ee50585df265c7766cc2bed51e43fb8 is the Base deployment; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $43 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest pool this index measures on Base.
Honest framing: a game token's value rides on an active player base, which is a harder thing to verify from a liquidity snapshot than contract state — the pool can be deep while the game itself thins. What the snapshot does confirm is that the asset trades at real depth on its home chain; what it can't confirm is whether the world behind the token is still populated.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHST or RDK?
By tracked market cap: GHST (Base) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHST or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: GHST (Base) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHST and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GHST at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GHST vs RYYGHST vs FKBGHST vs CRDGHST vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.