HostGHST vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
GHST (Base) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GHST vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GHST | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1014 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.20M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $43.18M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 237 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~51× the liquidity of GHST
- FKB measures ~764× the 24h volume of GHST
What the data says
GHST
GHST is Aavegotchi's token — the governance-and-utility asset of one of the older surviving blockchain games, deployed to Base where the project's community migrated for cheaper play. The address 0xac780b6e4ee50585df265c7766cc2bed51e43fb8 is the Base deployment; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $43 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest pool this index measures on Base.
Honest framing: a game token's value rides on an active player base, which is a harder thing to verify from a liquidity snapshot than contract state — the pool can be deep while the game itself thins. What the snapshot does confirm is that the asset trades at real depth on its home chain; what it can't confirm is whether the world behind the token is still populated.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHST or FKB?
By tracked market cap: GHST (Base) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHST or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: GHST (Base) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHST and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GHST at 0.00% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GHST vs RYYGHST vs CRDGHST vs RDKGHST vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.