HostGHST vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
GHST (Base) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GHST vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GHST | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1014 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.20M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $43.18M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 237 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~46× the liquidity of GHST
- CRD measures ~1,258× the 24h volume of GHST
What the data says
GHST
GHST is Aavegotchi's token — the governance-and-utility asset of one of the older surviving blockchain games, deployed to Base where the project's community migrated for cheaper play. The address 0xac780b6e4ee50585df265c7766cc2bed51e43fb8 is the Base deployment; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $43 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest pool this index measures on Base.
Honest framing: a game token's value rides on an active player base, which is a harder thing to verify from a liquidity snapshot than contract state — the pool can be deep while the game itself thins. What the snapshot does confirm is that the asset trades at real depth on its home chain; what it can't confirm is whether the world behind the token is still populated.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHST or CRD?
By tracked market cap: GHST (Base) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHST or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: GHST (Base) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHST and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GHST at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GHST vs RYYGHST vs FKBGHST vs RDKGHST vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.