HostFLUID vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
FLUID (Ethereum) vs ZAMA (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FLUID vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FLUID | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.36 | $0.04771 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.11M | $812.02K |
| Liquidity | $474.84K | $501.74K |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,699 | 224 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FLUID measures ~3.8× the 24h volume of ZAMA
- over the shared window FLUID moved 0.00% while ZAMA moved −18.2%
What the data says
FLUID
FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.
The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.
ZAMA
ZAMA is the token of Zama — the cryptography company building fully homomorphic encryption tooling for blockchains, one of the few serious attempts at confidential on-chain computation. The contract 0xa12cc123ba206d4031d1c7f6223d1c2ec249f4f3 is what our scan tracks: $502 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 14, 2026.
The honest read: this is an infrastructure bet on a hard problem — FHE has been "almost practical" for years, and Zama is among the credible teams actually shipping it — but the token's value depends on whether confidential-compute demand materializes on-chain at the scale the pitch implies. Real team, real tech, early-stage adoption risk.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLUID or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: FLUID (Ethereum) measures — and ZAMA (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLUID or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: FLUID (Ethereum) grades B and ZAMA (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLUID and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FLUID at 0.00% and ZAMA at −18.2%.
More comparisons
FLUID vs RYYFLUID vs FKBFLUID vs CRDFLUID vs RDKZAMA vs RYYZAMA vs FKBZAMA vs CRDZAMA vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.