HostFLUID vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
FLUID (Ethereum) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
FLUID vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| FLUID | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.36 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.11M | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $474.84K | $1.69B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,699 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~3,568× the liquidity of FLUID
- CCV measures ~882× the 24h volume of FLUID
What the data says
FLUID
FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.
The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLUID or CCV?
By tracked market cap: FLUID (Ethereum) measures — and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLUID or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: FLUID (Ethereum) grades B and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLUID and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show FLUID at 0.00% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FLUID vs RYYFLUID vs FKBFLUID vs CRDFLUID vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.