HostENS vs SUSHI — price, size and safety, side by side
ENS (Ethereum) vs SUSHI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ENS vs SUSHI — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| ENS | SUSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7.07 | $0.2679 |
| Market cap | $298.08M | $76.81M |
| 24h volume | $18.32K | $105.49K |
| Liquidity | $888.82K | $858.51K |
| FDV | $706.77M | $78.08M |
| Holders | 66,942 | 126,609 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,042 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ENS measures ~3.9× the market cap of SUSHI
- SUSHI measures ~5.8× the 24h volume of ENS
- SUSHI measures ~1.9× the holder count of ENS
What the data says
ENS
ENS has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why ENS is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, ENS shows a $888.82K pool and 66,942 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $298.08M, that $888.82K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 66,942 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ENS holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our September 27, 2026 read shows $859 thousand of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ENS or SUSHI?
By tracked market cap: ENS (Ethereum) measures $298.08M and SUSHI (Ethereum) measures $76.81M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ENS or SUSHI?
On the contract checks we publish: ENS (Ethereum) grades B and SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ENS and SUSHI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show ENS at 0.00% and SUSHI at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ENS vs AAVEUP vs ENSENS vs FFENS vs EMBERSUSHI vs SYBTCSUSHI vs OPENAIAURA vs SUSHISUSHI vs LINK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.