HostEFFECT vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
EFFECT (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
EFFECT vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EFFECT | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002851 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $1.51M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.35K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $44.32K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $1.51M | — |
| Holders | 5,906 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~38,231× the liquidity of EFFECT
- CCV measures ~2,024,482× the 24h volume of EFFECT
What the data says
EFFECT
Effect AI — EFFECT — one of crypto's oldest surviving tokens: the Effect Network's workforce/data-labeling platform token, launched as EFX on NEO in 2018, migrated to Solana, and still here. Vanity-ish mint EFFECT1A1R3Dz8Hg4q5SXKjkiPc6KDRUWQ7Czjvy4H7E; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $44 thousand of liquidity and roughly 5,906 holders.
Survival is the honest headline: an eight-year-old project that migrated chains, rebranded, and kept shipping microtask/data services is a different risk shape than a launch-coin — the team that didn't disappear is the strongest signal on the page, balanced against an economic model where the token's claim on platform activity has always been loose.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EFFECT or CCV?
By tracked market cap: EFFECT (Solana) measures $1.51M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EFFECT or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: EFFECT (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EFFECT and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EFFECT at +0.25% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
EFFECT vs RYYEFFECT vs FKBEFFECT vs CRDEFFECT vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.