HostCHIP vs NVDAON — price, size and safety, side by side
CHIP (Arbitrum) vs NVDAON (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17.
CHIP vs NVDAON — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| CHIP | NVDAON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0281 | $221.06 |
| Market cap | — | $3.61M |
| 24h volume | $957.59K | $3.94K |
| Liquidity | $999.49K | $491.43 |
| FDV | — | $3.61M |
| Holders | — | 1,781 |
| Age (days) | 118 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~2,034× the liquidity of NVDAON
- CHIP measures ~243× the 24h volume of NVDAON
What the data says
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $999 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 17, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
NVDAON
NVDAON is Ondo's tokenized NVIDIA — the third issuer family bringing tokenized equities to Solana (alongside Backed's xStocks and the pre-IPO products). The mint gEGtLTPNQ7jcg25zTetkbmF7teoDLcrfTnQfmn2ondo is what our scan tracks: $3.6 million market cap on $491 of pool liquidity with 1,781 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The flag is arithmetic again: a real, regulated issuer product sitting on a five-hundred-dollar pool — Ondo's tokens settle and redeem through Ondo's own rails, so public-pool depth is structurally thin and most holders interact with the issuer rather than this market. The claim is real; the exit route is not the pool. Compare liquidity conditions before choosing between the tokenized-NVDA products on the chain.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CHIP or NVDAON?
By tracked market cap: CHIP (Arbitrum) measures — and NVDAON (Solana) measures $3.61M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CHIP or NVDAON?
On the contract checks we publish: CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B and NVDAON (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CHIP and NVDAON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show CHIP at 0.00% and NVDAON at +4.21%.
More comparisons
CHIP vs RYYCHIP vs FKBCHIP vs CRDCHIP vs RDKNVDAON vs RYYNVDAON vs FKBNVDAON vs CRDNVDAON vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.