HostAI16Z vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
AI16Z (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
AI16Z vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| AI16Z | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0005204 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $413.02K | — |
| 24h volume | $5.61K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $30.16K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $413.02K | — |
| Holders | 97,547 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~57,779× the liquidity of AI16Z
- RDK measures ~514,786× the 24h volume of AI16Z
- over the shared window AI16Z moved −7.32% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
AI16Z
AI16Z was the flagship token of the ai16z / ElizaOS movement — the late-2024 AI-agent wave's most-watched Solana project, whose token at one point carried a valuation in the billions. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $413 thousand of market capitalization with 97,547 holders on mint HeLp6NuQkmYB4pYWo2zYs22mESHXPQYzXbB8n4V98jwC — a collapse of more than three orders of magnitude from peak, with the holder base left standing as the record of how big the moment was.
What the snapshot resolves: the freeze authority is confirmed revoked, so no remaining balance can be frozen. The mint authority did not resolve and is recorded unconfirmed — at this valuation the flag changes little, but the honest statement is "unknown, verify live," never an assumed pass. The authority guide covers what each flag would mean.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AI16Z or RDK?
By tracked market cap: AI16Z (Solana) measures $413.02K and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AI16Z or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: AI16Z (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AI16Z and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show AI16Z at −7.32% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
AI16Z vs RYYAI16Z vs FKBAI16Z vs CRDAI16Z vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.