HostAI16Z vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
AI16Z (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
AI16Z vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| AI16Z | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004294 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $413.02K | — |
| 24h volume | $5.61K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $30.16K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $413.02K | — |
| Holders | 97,547 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~56,171× the liquidity of AI16Z
- CCV measures ~488,905× the 24h volume of AI16Z
- over the shared window AI16Z moved −23.5% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
AI16Z
AI16Z was the flagship token of the ai16z / ElizaOS movement — the late-2024 AI-agent wave's most-watched Solana project, whose token at one point carried a valuation in the billions. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $413 thousand of market capitalization with 97,547 holders on mint HeLp6NuQkmYB4pYWo2zYs22mESHXPQYzXbB8n4V98jwC — a collapse of more than three orders of magnitude from peak, with the holder base left standing as the record of how big the moment was.
What the snapshot resolves: the freeze authority is confirmed revoked, so no remaining balance can be frozen. The mint authority did not resolve and is recorded unconfirmed — at this valuation the flag changes little, but the honest statement is "unknown, verify live," never an assumed pass. The authority guide covers what each flag would mean.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AI16Z or CCV?
By tracked market cap: AI16Z (Solana) measures $413.02K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AI16Z or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: AI16Z (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AI16Z and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show AI16Z at −23.5% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
AI16Z vs RYYAI16Z vs FKBAI16Z vs CRDAI16Z vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.