HostAI16Z vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
AI16Z (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
AI16Z vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| AI16Z | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0005204 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $413.02K | — |
| 24h volume | $5.61K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $30.16K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $413.02K | — |
| Holders | 97,547 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~65,811× the liquidity of AI16Z
- CRD measures ~718,335× the 24h volume of AI16Z
- over the shared window AI16Z moved −7.32% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
AI16Z
AI16Z was the flagship token of the ai16z / ElizaOS movement — the late-2024 AI-agent wave's most-watched Solana project, whose token at one point carried a valuation in the billions. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $413 thousand of market capitalization with 97,547 holders on mint HeLp6NuQkmYB4pYWo2zYs22mESHXPQYzXbB8n4V98jwC — a collapse of more than three orders of magnitude from peak, with the holder base left standing as the record of how big the moment was.
What the snapshot resolves: the freeze authority is confirmed revoked, so no remaining balance can be frozen. The mint authority did not resolve and is recorded unconfirmed — at this valuation the flag changes little, but the honest statement is "unknown, verify live," never an assumed pass. The authority guide covers what each flag would mean.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AI16Z or CRD?
By tracked market cap: AI16Z (Solana) measures $413.02K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AI16Z or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: AI16Z (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AI16Z and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show AI16Z at −7.32% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
AI16Z vs RYYAI16Z vs FKBAI16Z vs RDKAI16Z vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.