HostAAPLX vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
AAPLX (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
AAPLX vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| AAPLX | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $335.78 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $51.29M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.08M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $716.85K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $51.29M | — |
| Holders | 32,558 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~3,049× the liquidity of AAPLX
- FKB measures ~2,266× the 24h volume of AAPLX
- over the shared window AAPLX moved +5.51% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
AAPLX
AAPLX is the xStock for Apple — Backed Finance's tokenized-equity wrapper that puts a claim on AAPL's price onto Solana, tradable around the clock. The mint XsbEhLAtcf6HdfpFZ5xEMdqW8nfAvcsP5bdudRLJzJp is what our scan tracks: $51.3 million market cap, $717 thousand of pool liquidity, 32,558 holders as of September 16, 2026 — one of the widest-distributed xStocks in the corpus.
The honest shape: the same deal the whole xStock line offers — 24/7 Solana-speed access to a Nasdaq asset, paid for with issuer-custody risk (the shares sit in Backed's structure, not on-chain) and off-hours gap risk (the token keeps quoting while the real market sleeps). For a large-cap like Apple the underlying price is the most reliable anchor in the family — the premium-or-discount to Nasdaq is the number to watch.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AAPLX or FKB?
By tracked market cap: AAPLX (Solana) measures $51.29M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AAPLX or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: AAPLX (Solana) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AAPLX and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show AAPLX at +5.51% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
AAPLX vs RYYAAPLX vs CRDAAPLX vs RDKAAPLX vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.