Open app

AAPLX vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side

AAPLX (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

AAPLXB

$336.52
Apple xStock on Solana
Trade AAPLX
vs

CCVB

$2.01K
Cucuvo on Base
Trade CCV

AAPLX vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
AAPLX +5.74%  ·  CCV 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
AAPLXCCV
Price$336.52$2.01K
Market cap$51.29M
24h volume$1.08M$2.74B
Liquidity$716.85K$1.69B
FDV$51.29M
Holders32,558
Age (days)1
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

AAPLX

AAPLX is the xStock for Apple — Backed Finance's tokenized-equity wrapper that puts a claim on AAPL's price onto Solana, tradable around the clock. The mint XsbEhLAtcf6HdfpFZ5xEMdqW8nfAvcsP5bdudRLJzJp is what our scan tracks: $51.3 million market cap, $717 thousand of pool liquidity, 32,558 holders as of September 16, 2026 — one of the widest-distributed xStocks in the corpus.

The honest shape: the same deal the whole xStock line offers — 24/7 Solana-speed access to a Nasdaq asset, paid for with issuer-custody risk (the shares sit in Backed's structure, not on-chain) and off-hours gap risk (the token keeps quoting while the real market sleeps). For a large-cap like Apple the underlying price is the most reliable anchor in the family — the premium-or-discount to Nasdaq is the number to watch.

Full AAPLX safety read →

CCV

Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.

The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.

Full CCV safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, AAPLX or CCV?

By tracked market cap: AAPLX (Solana) measures $51.29M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, AAPLX or CCV?

On the contract checks we publish: AAPLX (Solana) grades B and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have AAPLX and CCV performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show AAPLX at +5.74% and CCV at 0.00%.

More comparisons

AAPLX vs RYYAAPLX vs FKBAAPLX vs CRDAAPLX vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.