HostAAPLX vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
AAPLX (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
AAPLX vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| AAPLX | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $335.78 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $51.29M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.08M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $716.85K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $51.29M | — |
| Holders | 32,558 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~2,769× the liquidity of AAPLX
- CRD measures ~3,732× the 24h volume of AAPLX
- over the shared window AAPLX moved +5.51% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
AAPLX
AAPLX is the xStock for Apple — Backed Finance's tokenized-equity wrapper that puts a claim on AAPL's price onto Solana, tradable around the clock. The mint XsbEhLAtcf6HdfpFZ5xEMdqW8nfAvcsP5bdudRLJzJp is what our scan tracks: $51.3 million market cap, $717 thousand of pool liquidity, 32,558 holders as of September 16, 2026 — one of the widest-distributed xStocks in the corpus.
The honest shape: the same deal the whole xStock line offers — 24/7 Solana-speed access to a Nasdaq asset, paid for with issuer-custody risk (the shares sit in Backed's structure, not on-chain) and off-hours gap risk (the token keeps quoting while the real market sleeps). For a large-cap like Apple the underlying price is the most reliable anchor in the family — the premium-or-discount to Nasdaq is the number to watch.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AAPLX or CRD?
By tracked market cap: AAPLX (Solana) measures $51.29M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AAPLX or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: AAPLX (Solana) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AAPLX and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show AAPLX at +5.51% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
AAPLX vs RYYAAPLX vs FKBAAPLX vs RDKAAPLX vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.