HostZAMA vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAMA (BNB Chain) vs GRT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-27.
ZAMA vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| ZAMA | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.08254 | $0.02869 |
| Market cap | $245.37M | $313.95M |
| 24h volume | $7.04M | $22.25K |
| Liquidity | $313.10K | $128.33K |
| FDV | $22.90M | $309.90M |
| Holders | 3,540 | 171,927 |
| Age (days) | 234 | — |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~2.4× the liquidity of GRT
- ZAMA measures ~317× the 24h volume of GRT
- GRT measures ~49× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GRT
The most important thing to know about GRT is its authority setup. Right now GRT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 61/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, GRT is showing thin liquidity of $128.33K and 171,927 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $128.33K pool against roughly $313.95M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. With 171,927 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created GRT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAMA or GRT?
By tracked market cap: ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M and GRT (Ethereum) measures $313.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAMA or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A and GRT (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAMA and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show ZAMA at 0.00% and GRT at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSOFRAX vs GRTGRT vs RFCGRT vs SCFGRT vs HABITAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.