HostGRT vs RFC — price, size and safety, side by side
GRT (Ethereum) vs RFC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-28.
GRT vs RFC — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| GRT | RFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02869 | $0.0004937 |
| Market cap | $313.95M | $525.96K |
| 24h volume | $22.25K | $33.75K |
| Liquidity | $128.33K | $127.90K |
| FDV | $309.90M | $525.96K |
| Holders | 171,927 | 11,633 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- GRT measures ~597× the market cap of RFC
- RFC measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of GRT
- GRT measures ~15× the holder count of RFC
What the data says
GRT
The most important thing to know about GRT is its authority setup. Right now GRT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 61/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, GRT is showing thin liquidity of $128.33K and 171,927 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $128.33K pool against roughly $313.95M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. With 171,927 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created GRT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
RFC
RFC starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The mint authority has been renounced, so the supply is fixed and no one can dilute it, and with freeze also off, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's why RFC sits comfortably at 92/100 as of 2026-09-26 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
On the market side, RFC brings a $127.90K pool and a holder base of 11,633 as of 2026-09-26. Encouragingly, that $127.90K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $525.96K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 11,633 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — 0.39% of supply as of 2026-09-26, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRT or RFC?
By tracked market cap: GRT (Ethereum) measures $313.95M and RFC (Solana) measures $525.96K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRT or RFC?
On the contract checks we publish: GRT (Ethereum) grades C and RFC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRT and RFC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show GRT at 0.00% and RFC at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FRAX vs GRTGRT vs SCFGRT vs HABITATALTSZN vs GRTRFC vs SCFRFC vs HABITATFRAX vs RFCRFC vs DUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.