Open app

WSTETH vs FWWETH — price, size and safety, side by side

WSTETH (Ethereum) vs FWWETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

WSTETHB

$3.16K
Wrapped liquid staked Ether 2.0 on Ethereum
Trade WSTETH
vs

FWWETHB

$2.54K
Few Wrapped Wrapped Ether on Ethereum
Trade FWWETH

WSTETH vs FWWETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
WSTETH +2.86%  ·  FWWETH +2.93% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
WSTETHFWWETH
Price$3.16K$2.54K
Market cap
24h volume$3.25M$5.30M
Liquidity$89.73M$99.94M
FDV
Holders
Age (days)361511
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

WSTETH

wstETH is the same bet as stETH, wrapped so DeFi can handle it: rather than rebasing daily, the token holds a fixed count that appreciates against stETH as rewards accrue — the shape lending markets, bridges and LPs prefer. The contract at 0x7f39c581f595b53c5cb19bd0b3f8da6c935e2ca0 is the canonical deployment; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $89.7 million of tracked pool liquidity.

Everything honest about stETH applies here — it is a claim on staked ETH through Lido, with the same depeg memory and the same dependence on the exit queue — plus one wrapper-level note: the price shown for wstETH is not the ETH price, it is stETH's value times a growing exchange rate, so it will always quote higher and still be "tracking" correctly.

Full WSTETH safety read →

FWWETH

FWWETH is the same wrapped-wrapper pattern applied to Ether — a claim on wrapped ETH, meaning the holder is one contract further from the asset than a WETH holder. The address 0xa250cc729bb3323e7933022a67b52200fe354767 is this deployment; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $100 million of tracked pool liquidity.

Honest framing: an extra wrapper only exists because some protocol needed a different claim shape — fee-on-transfer handling, rebasing isolation, vault mechanics — so the useful question is which wrapper contract stands between you and WETH, and whether its custody is verifiable. Nine figures of tracked depth says the wrapper sees real use; it doesn't say whose custody that use flows through.

Full FWWETH safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, WSTETH or FWWETH?

By tracked market cap: WSTETH (Ethereum) measures — and FWWETH (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, WSTETH or FWWETH?

On the contract checks we publish: WSTETH (Ethereum) grades B and FWWETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have WSTETH and FWWETH performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WSTETH at +2.86% and FWWETH at +2.93%.

More comparisons

WSTETH vs RYYWSTETH vs FKBWSTETH vs CRDWSTETH vs RDKFWWETH vs RYYFWWETH vs FKBFWWETH vs CRDFWWETH vs RDK

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.