HostWSTETH vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
WSTETH (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WSTETH vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WSTETH | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.16K | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.25M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $89.73M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 361 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~19× the liquidity of WSTETH
- RDK measures ~889× the 24h volume of WSTETH
What the data says
WSTETH
wstETH is the same bet as stETH, wrapped so DeFi can handle it: rather than rebasing daily, the token holds a fixed count that appreciates against stETH as rewards accrue — the shape lending markets, bridges and LPs prefer. The contract at 0x7f39c581f595b53c5cb19bd0b3f8da6c935e2ca0 is the canonical deployment; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $89.7 million of tracked pool liquidity.
Everything honest about stETH applies here — it is a claim on staked ETH through Lido, with the same depeg memory and the same dependence on the exit queue — plus one wrapper-level note: the price shown for wstETH is not the ETH price, it is stETH's value times a growing exchange rate, so it will always quote higher and still be "tracking" correctly.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WSTETH or RDK?
By tracked market cap: WSTETH (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WSTETH or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: WSTETH (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WSTETH and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WSTETH at +2.86% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WSTETH vs RYYWSTETH vs FKBWSTETH vs CRDWSTETH vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.